About pop stars
Many pop stars talk with particular pleasure about the scandalous fame they had during their school years. They annoyed teachers in class; their hairstyles shocked those around them. There were also those who were retained for the second year.
The problem of this text can be indicated as follows. People achieve fame by any means, including not always worthy ones. If only they (these people) were heard. After all, great fame, scandalous or laudatory, arouses interest in the “star”. Moreover, both to the man himself and to his work.
Commenting on this problem, we can say that fans of the performer, teenagers and young people, often take facts from the biography of the idol as an example to follow. And the phrase “to make life from someone” takes on a negative meaning if these examples are not the best. After all, the younger generation is people with little life experience, so it seems to them: if they start behaving defiantly, despise public opinion, go “against the grain,” success in life will come by itself.
What is the author's position? He critically evaluates those artists who have not developed the right guiding idea for themselves. An artist who can sing well is happy with fame and money. But in order to succeed as a creative person, this is not enough. A true artist is distinguished by the uniqueness and inimitability of his talent, which is unlike anyone else’s talent. And shocking statements about how “bad” he is, and therefore equal to the public, mere mortals - these statements will not elevate him, will not decorate him.
I agree with the author’s opinion and believe: a real artist, who respects himself and his work, will not make faces and slander himself in order to please the tastes of an undemanding public. The audience will believe the artist only if he, as an artist, is honest both in life and in his stage image. It also happens that idols “forget” about the heights they have achieved, and when they see those in need of help, they do everything in their power for them. Many years ago, Joseph Kobzon flew to Afghanistan seven times to speak there before the temporarily deployed contingent of Soviet troops. Immediately after the Chernobyl disaster, Alla Pugacheva found herself in the disaster area with a group of artists, where she performed in front of the liquidators of the accident. Chulpan Khamatova is the founder of the Help Children Foundation. Singer Alsou has cured more than one seriously ill child at her own expense. The team of “Buranovskie Babushki” uses the money they earn to build a temple in their village.
The second example is given from the tragedy of A.S. Pushkin "Mozart and Salieri". The main characters are antipodes: the brilliant and trusting Mozart and the gloomy Salieri, tormented by envy and malicious intent. The author of the tragedy based the plot on the legend of Mozart’s poisoning by his secret enemy. However, as facts testify, Salieri was the author of many operas and the teacher of Schubert, Liszt, and Beethoven. And although he “made craft... the foundation of art,” he reached heights in his work. Otherwise, Mozart would not have called him his friend and would not have glorified their “sincere union.” Perseverance and hard work elevated Salieri.
Nothing less than talent and activity will create glory for a person.
An example of writing an essay based on a text by I. Gontsov.
Essay based on the text by I. Gontsov.
Essay on I. Gontsov
Text according to I. Gontsov:
For some reason, many modern pop stars talk with particular pleasure about how poorly they did at school. Some were reprimanded for hooliganism, some were retained for the second year, some made teachers faint with their breathtaking hairstyles... You can have different attitudes towards such revelations of our “stars”: some of these stories about mischievous childhood lead in awe, others begin to grumpily complain that today the path to the stage is open only to mediocrities and ignoramuses. But most worrying is the reaction of teenagers. They have a strong belief that the shortest path to fame runs through the police nursery. They take everything at face value. They do not always understand that stories about a “crazy” childhood, when the future “star” amazed everyone around him with his exotic uniqueness, are just a stage legend, something like a concert costume that distinguishes an artist from an ordinary person. A teenager not only perceives information, he actively transforms it. This information becomes the basis for his life program, for developing ways and means of achieving his goal. That is why a person who broadcasts something to an audience of millions must have a high sense of responsibility. Is he actually expressing his thoughts or is he unconsciously continuing his stage act and saying what his fans expect from him? Look: I’m “one of my own”, just like everyone else. Hence the ironic and condescending attitude towards education, and the flirtatious mockery: “Learning is light, and ignorance is a pleasant twilight,” and arrogant narcissism. But the transfer ended. What remains in the souls of those who listened to the artist? What seeds did he sow in trusting hearts? Who did he make better? Who did he direct on the path of creative creation? When a young journalist asked these questions to one famous DJ, he simply snorted: screw you, that’s not what I’m here for... And in this bewildered indignation of the “pop star” civic immaturity and human “undereducation” are clearly manifested. And a person who has not yet built himself as an individual, has not realized his mission in society, becomes a humble servant of the crowd, its tastes and needs. He may be able to sing, but he doesn’t know why he sings. If art does not call to the light, if it, giggling and winking slyly, drags a person into a “pleasant twilight”, if it destroys unshakable values with the poisonous acid of irony, then a reasonable question arises: is such “art” needed by society, is it worthy of it? to become part of the national culture? (According to I. Gontsov)
Essay based on the text by I. Gontsov
Personality formation occurs under the influence of various factors, one of which is the influence of authoritative people: parents, teachers, actors, pop stars. Their life experience and views, as I. Gontsov rightly notes, become the basis for the life program of many young people. And sometimes it is very important in what direction this influence is carried out. Reflecting on this issue, the author of the text touches on the problem of a person’s moral responsibility to society. It is impossible not to notice that many modern pop artists, in search of popularity, use various means, offering their fans very dubious information about themselves, which not only misleads people, but also negatively affects the lifestyle of the most gullible. This certainly causes concern in the author and a desire to make many people think about it. The author is alarmed by the fact that modern artists are less and less aware of their mission as cultural figures. According to N. Gontsov, art is designed to spiritually and aesthetically nourish and educate people, and not just entertain. It is difficult to disagree with the author’s position, because it is immoral and dangerous to build a stage image that neglects the unshakable values of society. It is very difficult to determine the line where words, actions and even objects become vulgar and vulgarized. There must be a moral sense, which can be formed by art, in particular literature. The theme of philistinism and vulgarity was stated most strongly in Russian classics. Suffice it to recall the “majestic vulgar” Chichikov, a clever swindler and scoundrel from N.V. Gogol’s poem “Dead Souls”. Many people, following the lead of fashion and time, set the wrong goals for themselves, sometimes even breaking the law in order to achieve them. I. Bunin in the story “The Gentleman from San Francisco” showed the fate of a man who served false values. Wealth was his god, and this god he worshiped. But when the American millionaire died, it turned out that true happiness passed the man by: he died without ever knowing what life was. Each person influences others, and what he leaves in their souls is extremely important. People must understand that immorality and disregard for immutable values cannot bring anything into our minds and souls that would help us develop as individuals!
Source text (According to D.S. Likhachev)
(1) Memory is one of the most important properties of existence, any existence: material, spiritual, human.
(2) A sheet of paper. (3) Squeeze it and spread it out. (4) There will be folds on it, and if you compress it a second time, some of the folds will fall along the previous folds: the paper “has memory.”
(5) Individual plants, stones with traces of their origin and movement during the Ice Age, glass, water, etc. have memory.
(6) What can we say about “genetic memory” - memory embedded in centuries, memory passing from one generation of living beings to the next.
(7) At the same time, memory is not mechanical at all. (8) This is the most important creative process. (9) What is needed is remembered; Through memory, good experience is accumulated, a tradition is formed, everyday skills, family skills, labor skills, and public institutions are created.
(10) Memory resists the destructive power of time.
(11) This property of memory is extremely important.
(12) It is customary to primitively divide time into past, present and future. (13) But thanks to memory, the past enters the present, and the future is, as it were, predicted by the present, connected with the past.
(14) Memory - overcoming time, overcoming death.
(15) This is the greatest moral significance of memory. (16) “Unmemorable” is, first of all, a person who is ungrateful, irresponsible, and therefore incapable of good, selfless deeds.
(17) Irresponsibility is born from the lack of awareness that nothing passes without a trace. (18) A person who commits an unkind act thinks that this act will not be preserved in his personal memory and in the memory of those around him. (19) He himself, obviously, is not accustomed to cherishing the memory of the past, to feeling a feeling of gratitude to his ancestors, to work, to their concerns, and therefore he thinks that everything will be forgotten about him.
(20) Conscience is basically memory, to which is added a moral assessment of what has been done. (21) But if what is perfect is not retained in memory, then there can be no evaluation. (22) Without memory there is no conscience.
(23) That is why it is so important to be brought up in a moral climate of memory: family memory, folk memory, cultural memory.
(According to D.S. Likhachev)
Essay based on the text by D. Likhachev.
D.S. Likhachev tells us that memory is a creative process, with its help humanity overcomes time and death, conscience and memory are closely interrelated concepts.
Memory is an extremely important property of the human mind and soul. A person who has lost it is “lost” in this world. This is, first of all, a loss of mental, moral and ethical orientation. With the loss of memory, much accumulated by experience and years disappears, an emptiness appears, and with it the need to fill it with something again. For such a person, unconsciousness is torment.
The author also talks about another unconsciousness - ingratitude, the inability to respond kindly to kindness or experience a feeling of sincere gratitude to another person. For example, those who once sacrificed their lives for the sake of the bright future of their descendants, their Motherland, and their faith. Unfortunately, among our contemporaries there are barbarian people who, indulging in excesses, dishonor shrines - the graves of those killed in war. Patriotic soldiers did not lay down their heads so that absolutely “memorless” descendants would consign their names to oblivion! Fighting for every five of their Fatherland, the warriors defended freedom, honor, and the good name of their fathers and grandfathers. Shedding blood for their native land, they blessed their children for a bright future - the successors of their family, but by no means “unmemorable” descendants.
Without memory there is no conscience,” D.S. is sure. Likhachev. And I agree with him. Can a person who remembers nothing and recognizes no one be responsible for himself, his time before the past and the future, give a correct assessment of himself, today? The answer to this question is clear. Only a culture based on centuries-old traditions allows us to develop a person’s rich inner world and prevent the formation of that emptiness of the soul that manifests itself in immoral actions. In my opinion, religion as a part of culture could also play an important role in this case. Any traditional religion is rich in its customs and laws, which help the individual to worthily carry within himself the genetic memory of the cultural development of all humanity. According to D.S. Likhachev, the same genetic memory of the universe is largely possessed by the objects around a person - plants, stones, water, glass, a sheet of paper, etc.
Source text according to I. Gontsov
For some reason, many modern pop stars talk with particular pleasure about how poorly they did at school. Some were reprimanded for hooliganism, some were retained for the second year, some made teachers faint with their breathtaking hairstyles... You can have different attitudes towards such revelations of our “stars”: some of these stories about mischievous childhood lead in awe, others begin to grumpily complain that today the path to the stage is open only to mediocrities and ignoramuses. But most worrying is the reaction of teenagers. They have a strong belief that the shortest path to fame runs through the police nursery. They take everything at face value. They do not always understand that stories about a “crazy” childhood, when the future “star” amazed everyone around him with his exotic uniqueness, are just a stage legend, something like a concert costume that distinguishes an artist from an ordinary person. A teenager not only perceives information, he actively transforms it. This information becomes the basis for his life program, for developing ways and means of achieving his goal. That is why a person who broadcasts something to an audience of millions must have a high sense of responsibility. Is he actually expressing his thoughts or is he unconsciously continuing his stage act and saying what his fans expect from him? Look: I’m “one of my own”, just like everyone else. Hence the ironic and condescending attitude towards education, and the flirtatious mockery: “Learning is light, and ignorance is a pleasant twilight,” and arrogant narcissism. But the transfer ended. What remains in the souls of those who listened to the artist? What seeds did he sow in trusting hearts? Who did he make better? Who did he direct on the path of creative creation? When a young journalist asked these questions to one famous DJ, he simply snorted: screw you, that’s not what I’m here for... And in this bewildered indignation of the “pop star” civic immaturity and human “undereducation” are clearly manifested. And a person who has not yet built himself as an individual, has not realized his mission in society, becomes a humble servant of the crowd, its tastes and needs. He may be able to sing, but he doesn’t know why he sings. If art does not call to the light, if it, giggling and winking slyly, drags a person into a “pleasant twilight”, if it destroys unshakable values with the poisonous acid of irony, then a reasonable question arises: is such “art” needed by society, is it worthy of it? to become part of the national culture? (According to I. Gontsov)
Essay based on the text by I. Gontsov
Personality formation occurs under the influence of various factors, one of which is the influence of authoritative people: parents, teachers, actors, pop stars. Their life experience and views, as I. Gontsov rightly notes, become the basis for the life program of many young people. And sometimes it is very important in what direction this influence is carried out. Reflecting on this issue, the author of the text touches on the problem of a person’s moral responsibility to society. It is impossible not to notice that many modern pop artists, in search of popularity, use various means, offering their fans very dubious information about themselves, which not only misleads people, but also negatively affects the lifestyle of the most gullible. This certainly causes concern in the author and a desire to make many people think about it. The author is alarmed by the fact that modern artists are less and less aware of their mission as cultural figures. According to N. Gontsov, art is designed to spiritually and aesthetically nourish and educate people, and not just entertain. It is difficult to disagree with the author’s position, because it is immoral and dangerous to build a stage image that neglects the unshakable values of society. It is very difficult to determine the line where words, actions and even objects become vulgar and vulgarized. There must be a moral sense, which can be formed by art, in particular literature. The theme of philistinism and vulgarity was stated most strongly in Russian classics. Suffice it to recall the “majestic vulgar” Chichikov, a clever swindler and scoundrel from N.V. Gogol’s poem “Dead Souls”. Many people, following the lead of fashion and time, set the wrong goals for themselves, sometimes even breaking the law in order to achieve them. I. Bunin in the story “The Gentleman from San Francisco” showed the fate of a man who served false values. Wealth was his god, and this god he worshiped. But when the American millionaire died, it turned out that true happiness passed the man by: he died without ever knowing what life was. Each person influences others, and what he leaves in their souls is extremely important. People must understand that immorality and disregard for immutable values cannot bring anything into our minds and souls that would help us develop as individuals!
Text according to V. Konetsky:
(1) One day, starlings flew to my watch, during an October, autumn, stormy day. (2) We rushed in the night from the shores of Iceland to Norway. (3) On a ship illuminated by powerful lights. (4) And in this foggy world tired constellations arose...
(5) I left the wheelhouse onto the wing of the bridge. (6) The wind, rain and night immediately became loud. (7) I raised the binoculars to my eyes. (8) The white superstructures of the ship, rescue whaleboats, rain-dark covers, and birds—wet lumps fluffed up by the wind—swayed in the glass. (9) They rushed between the antennas and tried to hide from the wind behind the pipe.
(10) These small, fearless birds chose the deck of our ship as a temporary shelter on their long journey to the south. (11) Of course, I remembered Savrasov: rooks, spring, there is still snow, and the trees have woken up. (12) And in general I remembered everything that happens around us and what happens inside our souls when the Russian spring comes and the rooks and starlings fly in. (13) You can’t describe it. (14) This brings me back to childhood. (15) And this is connected not only with the joy of the awakening of nature, but also with a deep feeling of the homeland, Russia.
(16) And let them scold our Russian artists for their old-fashioned and literary subjects. (17) Behind the names of Savrasov, Levitan, Serov, Korovin, Kustodiev lies not only the eternal joy of life in art. (18) It is Russian joy that is hidden, with all its tenderness, modesty and depth. (19) And just as the Russian song is simple, so is the painting.
(20) And in our complex age, when the art of the world painfully searches for general truths, when the complexity of life calls for the most complex analysis of the psyche of an individual person and the most complex analysis of the life of society - in our age, artists should not forget about one simple function of art - to awaken and illuminate the sense of the Motherland in a fellow tribesman.
(21) Let our landscape painters not be known abroad. (22) In order not to pass by Serov, you must be Russian. (23) Art is art when it evokes in a person a feeling of happiness, albeit fleeting. (24) And we are designed in such a way that the most piercing happiness arises in us when we feel love for Russia. (25) I don’t know if other nations have such an indissoluble connection between aesthetic sensation and the feeling of homeland...
(According to V. Konetsky)
Essay based on the text by V. Konetsky
Homeland... Native places... They have some inexplicable power. In difficult days of our lives, we return to the places where we spent our childhood and youth. What is connected with the feeling of homeland for a Russian person? This problem is posed to readers by the famous Russian writer V. Konetsky.
The author recalls what happened in his soul with the arrival of spring, with the arrival of rooks and starlings. This feeling is associated with a “deep feeling of the homeland, Russia.” Pictures of the native land that are close to the heart warm the human heart and make it happy. Each of us has experienced all this more than once.
V. Konetsky believes that in our difficult, difficult times, artists should not forget about the function of art as “to awaken and illuminate a sense of homeland in a fellow tribesman.” And such Russian artists as Korovin, Levitan, Serov help maintain this feeling. Their landscapes, at first glance, are simple and unpretentious. But they are Russia itself, because they contain something that awakens a sense of patriotism in a person. The author claims that the Russian people have an “inextricable connection between aesthetic sensation and the feeling of the homeland.”
One cannot but agree with V. Konetsky, who is sure that a Russian person’s feeling of homeland is a feeling of happiness. Our memories of our native land are associated with the very first joys in life, with an as yet unconscious gratitude for it.
The theme of the homeland sounds in many works of Russian classical poets and runs like a red line through all their work. The famous poet Sergei Aleksandrovich Yesenin wrote: “My lyrics are alive with one great love, love for the homeland. The feeling of homeland is central to my work.” Indeed, every line of S. A. Yesenin’s poems is imbued with ardent love for native land. He was born and raised in the outback, among the vast Russian expanses, among fields and meadows, so Russia sank into the poet’s heart from a young age. All the beauties of his native land were reflected in his poems, full of love for the Russian land. No matter what S. A. Yesenin wrote about, even in the most difficult moments of loneliness, the bright image of his homeland warmed his soul.
The famous Soviet journalist Vasily Mikhailovich Peskov, in his article “The Feeling of the Motherland,” wrote that just as every river has a source, so the feeling of the Motherland has its own beginning. This could have been a river in childhood, flowing through willow trees across the steppe, a green slope with birch trees and a walking path. V. M. Peskov believes that the branched tree of the feeling of the Motherland should have the very first initial sprout, and the stronger it is, the faster the tree will grow, the greener its top. Indeed, the Motherland is like a mother, one for life! There will never be another family like this. These are roots, these are traditions, culture, this is everything that makes a person stronger when this power is felt. Everything in this world has its origins.
So, the feeling of the Motherland is the most important feeling for every person.
Option: 52
1. Task formulation
Formulate
text) is not evaluated.
2. Source text
(1) For some reason, many modern pop stars talk with particular pleasure about how poorly they did at school. (2) Some were reprimanded for hooliganism, some were retained for the second year, some made teachers faint with their breathtaking hairstyles... (3) One can have different attitudes towards such revelations of our “stars”: some these stories about mischievous childhood make you touch, others begin to grumpily complain that today the path to the stage is open only to mediocrities and ignoramuses.
(4) But what worries me most is the reaction of teenagers. (5) They have a strong belief that the shortest path to fame runs through the police nursery. (b) They take everything at face value. (7) They do not always understand that stories about a “crazy” childhood, when the future “star” amazed everyone around him with his exotic uniqueness, are just a stage legend, something like a concert costume that distinguishes an artist from an ordinary person. (8) A teenager not only perceives information, he actively transforms it. (9) This information becomes the basis for his life program, for developing ways and means of achieving the goal. (10) That’s why a person who broadcasts something to an audience of millions must have a high sense of responsibility.
(11) Does he really express his thoughts or does he unconsciously continue his stage acting and say what his fans expect from him? (12) Look: I’m “one of my own,” just like everyone else. (13) Hence the ironic and condescending attitude towards education, and the flirtatious mockery: “Learning is light, and ignorance is a pleasant twilight,” and arrogant narcissism. (14) But the transmission ended. (15) What remained in the souls of those who listened to the artist? (1b) What seeds did he sow in gullible hearts? (17)Who did he make better? (18) Whom did he direct on the path of creative creation? (19) When a young journalist asked these questions to one famous DJ, he simply snorted: screw you, that’s not what I’m here for. And in this bewildered indignation of the “pop star” civic immaturity, human “undereducation” is clearly manifested. (21) And a person who has not yet built himself as an individual, has not realized his mission in society, becomes a humble servant of the crowd, its tastes and needs. (22) He may be able to sing, but he doesn’t know why he sings.
(23) If art does not call to the light, if it, giggling and winking slyly, drags a person into a “pleasant twilight”, if it destroys unshakable values with the poisonous acid of irony, then a reasonable question arises: is such “art” necessary for society? is it to become part of the national culture?
(According to I. Gontsov)
Single state exam, 2007 RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, grade 11.
Option; 52
3. Information about text
Main 1) the problem of the influence of popular artists on
problems: teenagers (how popular artists and their
statements on teenagers?);
2) the problem of the artist’s moral responsibility to society (what remains in people’s souls after the artist’s performance?);
3) the problem of artists’ disregard for social norms for the sake of popularity with the public (is it worth building a stage image on shockingness, on disregard for social norms, and education?);
4) the problem of the purpose of art (does society need art built on neglect
position: on teenagers who believe their stories about bad
studies and bad behavior in childhood and believe that this is how you can succeed in life; therefore, the artist must have a special sense of responsibility;
2) if the artist does not realize his mission in society, does not understand himself as an individual, he becomes a humble servant of the crowd;
3) the stage image, based on disregard for social norms and disrespect for education, is similar to a concert costume; such an image does not help the artist make the audience better, direct people on the path of creativity, creation;
4) art that does not help people become better, does not call to the light, is unworthy of being part of the national culture.
Criteria assessing the answer to a task C1
Single state exam, 2007, RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, 11th grade.
Option: 53
1. Task formulation
Write an essay based on the text you read.
Formulate and comment on one of the problems posed
Justify your answer based on knowledge, life or
reading experience (the first two arguments are taken into account).
The volume of the essay is at least 150 words.
A work written without relying on the text read (not based on this
text) is not evaluated.
If the essay is a retelling or complete
rewritten original text without any comments,
then such work is scored zero points.
Write an essay carefully, legible handwriting.
2. Source text
(1) Vasily Fedotov was a rather interesting type of merchant, who emerged from the ranks of clerks and achieved good prosperity, but self-interest with the desire to put an extra million in his pocket ruined him.
(2) Fedotov was of average height, bald, and tried not to look you in the eye. (3) When meeting, he raised his eyelids, looked at you with a quick glance and immediately lowered them; the same look, used as a special kind of coquetry, was observed in some women. (4) He was extremely nervous; when he spoke to you, he raised his eyes to the sky, his hands too, to testify that he was right, and if this, in his opinion, was not enough, he shed a tear and beat his chest. (5) His whole figure, his whole appearance with these gestures and tears were somehow unnatural, and they didn’t particularly trust him, calling him Vaska Fedotov behind his back, saying: “This Vaska will still invite us for a “cup of tea.” (6) Among the merchants, a “cup of tea” meant a meeting of creditors with an offer of a discount. (7) And this opinion turned out to be absolutely correct; he promptly, before the invitation to a “cup of tea,” transferred both houses to his wife, the cost of which amounted to about three hundred thousand rubles, deposited capital in her name in the bank, also three hundred thousand rubles, and was sure: with this he secured himself for a rainy day .
(8) But it turned out that, as they say, man proposes, but God disposes, (9) The competition passed, and his wife sent him out of her
Houses. (10) Fedotov, insulted, ruined, in order to exist, became a stockbroker and, doing commission business, visited his friends With different offers. (11) Once during such a visit, he, gloomy, unhappy, with eyes wandering from excitement, came to me, sat down on a chair and, grabbing his head, fell on the table and sobbed. (12) His sobs were sincere, and not crafty, as he had to do before to obtain any benefits; now he was really suffering. (13) Water and valerian drops brought him to a calmer state, he apologized for the disturbance and said:
(14) - You know that I lost my entire fortune, my favorite business, was abandoned by my wife, but no matter how painful it was for me, I endured it. (15) I had an only daughter who was dearest to me. (1b) When I married her, I awarded her fifty thousand rubles, and gave her the same amount of diamonds and a dowry; whenever she came to me, I always gave her something, asked her: “Do you need anything?” (17) She was joy and love for me, I lived for her, and she was everything to me! (18) And on the way to you, at the Ilyinsky Gate, I see her coming towards me. (19) You can imagine my unexpected joy! (20) I hurry to her. (21) When she saw me, she turned to the side, pretending that she did not want to talk to me. (22) This was already beyond my strength!
(According to N. Varentsov)
3. Text information |
||
Main problems: | the problem of true and false life values (what can be called true life values?); the problem of the relationship between fathers and children (what should the relationship between fathers and children be based on?); the problem of responsibility for one’s actions (does everything in human life go unpunished?). |
|
Only universal human values are true: love, devotion, decency; in relations between children and parents, non-monetary relations should be a priority; a person is always responsible for his actions. |
Evaluation criteria answer on task C1
Option; 54
1. Task formulation
Write an essay based on the text you read.
Formulate and comment on one of the problems posed
Justify your answer based on knowledge, life or
reading experience (the first two arguments are taken into account).
The volume of the essay is at least 150 words.
A work written without relying on the text read (not based on this
text) is not evaluated.
If the essay is a retelling or. fully
rewritten original text without any comments,
then such work is scored zero points.
Write an essay carefully, legible handwriting.
2. Source text
(1) I am standing in the lobby of the editorial office of a central newspaper and patiently waiting for the duty officer to finish her telephone conversation with a friend. (2) The attendant is on the phone, explaining in detail the address of some friend of hers. (3) Finally, her distant interlocutor, and at the same time I, thoroughly understood the right and left turns, fences, pits and pipes. (4) The phone goes off, the attendant leans back in her chair, apparently remembers her friends for two minutes and then, without looking at me, plunges into the visitors’ book. (5) Naturally, I can’t stand it here. (6) A stormy scene follows, I am branded an “insensitive”, “impolite”, “meticulous person”, words are flying that I want to immediately forget. (7) Only fifteen minutes later, after considerable shock, I was able to go to the letters department, where the editor was waiting for me.
(8) On top of the pile of envelopes and miscellaneous papers that litter the table are two sheets of paper with the editor’s notes. (9) This is for me. (10) One letter from the Urals, another from the Rostov region. (11) One from a young specialist, the other from a veteran. (12) But the content is almost the same. (13) It is described, in particular, how, upon entering an official’s office, you need to stand for several minutes in front of the boss sitting in a chair, busy with his own affairs, so that “every cricket knows its nest.”
(14) Naturally, after the scene that just played out at the entrance, I immediately have a silent question for the authors
letters: why do they only talk about managers? (15) Is the watchman worse? (1b) Or do the watchmen not have absolute power at their workplace? (17) Or do they undergo preliminary selection for a position with the identification of their abilities for a sensitive (and therefore businesslike) attitude towards the visitor? (18) And the sellers? (19) Receptionists? (20)Nurses? (21) Bus drivers?
(22) I silently gather up stacks of letters. (23) This is a source of sociological information about the norms governing people’s relationships.
(24) What are “norms”? (25) These are rules that must be followed to achieve some goal. (26) People’s behavior is always subject to some rules and norms. (27)[...] norms determine the forms and nature of interaction between people in society. (28) They are invisibly present in our consciousness. (29) These norms - unwritten laws - seem elusive to us. (30) Is it possible, and if so, how to formulate a look, a smile, a shrug of the shoulders, and intonation of voice? (31) But it is precisely these “little things” that determine what scientists call informal communication.
(32) When a person causes obvious damage to someone’s property or health, he is brought to court, criminally or administratively liable. (33) Here legal norms come into force, which are established by legislation. (34) They are reflected in regulations and are included in the codes of laws. (35) But no codes can provide for strict standards of relationships between people, even directly in production. (3b) Impoliteness or the desire to humiliate a colleague, client, passenger, subordinate, or classmate is not considered a violation of legal norms. (37) Informal communication is an area of morality. (38) Behavior here should be regulated differently. (39) How?
(According to M. Bobneva)
Criteria for assessing the answer to task C1
Unified State Exam, 2007 G. RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, 11th grade.
Option: 54
3. Text information
Main 1) the problem of ethical standards governing business
problems: relationships between people (how should they behave
people endowed with any kind of power - from a watchman to a manager - in relation to other people?);
2) the problem of the relationship between legal and ethical norms (is it possible to legally regulate informal relationships between people at work?);
3) the problem of forming norms of moral behavior in society (how can informal behavior of people in society be regulated? How to influence the “area
position: empowered, neglects ethics in relationships
with “ordinary” people;
2) all the norms of “informal communication” cannot be prescribed in laws; this is an area of morality;
3) we need to look for a way to regulate social and moral norms.
Criteria for assessing the answer to task C1
Unified State exam, 2007 RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, 11th grade.
Option: 55
1. Task formulation
Write an essay based on the text you read.
Formulate and comment on one of the problems posed
Justify your answer based on knowledge, life or
reading experience (the first two arguments are taken into account).
The volume of the essay is at least 150 words.
A work written without relying on the text read (not based on this
text) is not evaluated.
If the essay is a retelling or complete
rewritten original text without any comments,
then such work is scored zero points.
Write an essay carefully, legible handwriting.
2. Source text
(1) She was a little late; all the benches in the courtyard were occupied by the public. (2) However, a place was waiting for her on a fenced bench, where several famous theatrical personalities were sitting. (3) She said hello to her friends, sat down and looked around. (4) Everything is thought out: the play is from the fifties and sixties, it is played in the natural scenery of a Moscow courtyard, nothing needs to be tinkered with. (5) Everything here remains the same as it was in those years. (b) Except that an old tapestry was deliberately hung on one of the walls of the house.
(7) She took her glasses out of her purse and looked closely. It was exactly the same woven tapestry with fringe that hung over her trestle bed in her parents’ apartment for many, many years. (9) Exactly such a tapestry: it is woven with a family of deer descending to a watering hole, a mill on a stream, distant calling mountains...
(10) About ten minutes later it began to get dark, the actors came out, and the action began.
(11) She couldn’t concentrate. (12) The sight of the tapestry, the companion of her childhood and youth, hung for everyone to see, made it difficult to follow the actors.
(13) Suddenly I remembered a whole fan of long-forgotten pictures. (14) Grandma feeds her porridge right in bed. (15) The characters embroidered on the new tapestry are present here very actively, both as decoration and as participants in the action...
(16) Grandmother’s speckled hand with a spoon obediently rested on the tapestry bush, from which a head with ears was sticking out, then peacefully followed into the neighboring, fraternally spread mouth.
(17) And then, during my school years, how sweet it was to be sick under her tapestry! (18) The main thing is that you could lie in an embrace with a book or even several books, changing them alternately, because you know everything by heart, and this is especially sweet.
(19) One day, in ninth grade, she ended up in the house of a fellow student, the daughter of a famous lawyer in the city. (20) Having grown up in a family of very small income, she had never seen such wealth before - all these silver cutlery with monograms during an everyday family dinner, this ancient heavy furniture, these huge, delicate ornate patterns of carpets.
(21) “That one is Persian,” said the lawyer’s daughter, nodding at the wall of the dining room, “and in my dad’s office there’s a real one from Peshawar, my grandfather’s.” (22) He is almost a hundred years old...
(23) What pulled her tongue to say:
(24) - We also have a carpet, not so big...
(25) Her friend wrinkled her nose funny and said softly:
(26) - You don’t have a carpet, but a tapestry with ducks. All this bourgeois vulgarity was in fashion ten years ago.
(28) She ran home and, in a fit of indignant shame, began to tear off her tapestry from the nails.
(29) - What are you doing? - asked her mother behind her back. (30) - What's wrong with you?
(31) - Because it’s vulgarity, vulgarity! - she shouted passionately.
(32) - Ah! - said the mother. (33) - Where did you pick this up today? (34) And, having listened to everything that her daughter, choking with insult, blurted out to her,
spoke calmly:
(35) - This is it - [...]. (Z6) Hang the tapestry back, wash your hands and go eat.
(37) And she, sobbing helplessly, hung up the tapestry, sat down under its spreading crown and cried, through angry tears looking at the familiar stumps, grass and pointed mountains in the distance down to the millimeter...
(38) Several more years passed, the tapestry became thin in the area of the mill, my mother made a beautiful pillowcase out of it.
(39) Here’s what’s funny: not long ago the pillow migrated to their new apartment.
(40) - Well, how was the performance? - asked the daughter, returning from some of her parties.
(41) “You know, they hung a tapestry there...” she said, smiling.
(42) - What kind of tapestry?
(43) -Well, exactly like ours, Remember?
(45) -No, I don’t remember...
(46) - Wait! (47) How do you mean “I don’t remember”? !
(48) - Oh God! - the daughter sighed, rolled her eyes, and went to put the kettle on.
(49) And her heart suddenly sank, a pang of resentment rose to her throat.
(50) - You don’t remember anything! - she exclaimed. (51) Indifference is the banner of your generation!
(52) - Banner?! - the daughter snorted. (53) - Well, mother, you give it! - and went to her room.
(54) - Why did you pester her with your tapestry? - the husband asked in a low voice. (55) - This is your childhood and youth, so love them to your heart’s content, what does the girl have to do with it?
(According to D. Rubina)
3. Text information
Main 1) the problem of memory (what remains in the human
problems: memory from such an important period as childhood?);
2) the problem of generations [which of the heroes is right in their attitude towards memories?);
3) the problem of true and false values (what is _______________ value for the heroine of a simple woven tapestry?).
position: things from the past that will appear
beautiful because they are associated with childhood and
2) the heroine’s daughter is still too young to relate to memories as touchingly as her adult mother;
3) true values in life are the events that happen in it and the memory of these events.
Criteria for assessing the answer to task C1
Single state exam, 2007 RUSSIAN LANGUAGE.1 1 Class.
Option: 56
1. Task formulation
Write an essay based on the text you read.
Formulate and comment on one of the problems posed
Justify your answer based on knowledge, life or
reading experience (the first two arguments are taken into account).
The volume of the essay is at least 150 words.
A work written without relying on the text read (not based on this
text) is not evaluated.
If the essay is a retelling or complete
rewritten original text without any comments,
then such work is scored zero points.
Write an essay carefully, legible handwriting.
2. Source text
(1) On the anniversary of Pushkin’s anniversary, at one of the meetings I had the opportunity to witness a very interesting conversation. (2) The deputy head of one of the city districts asked his colleague how they wanted to celebrate the anniversary. (3) The official sighed and said plaintively: “We don’t know yet...” (4) There was so much painful melancholy in his voice, so much genuine fatigue! (3) They forced a poor man to do something in which he sees no meaning, no benefit.
(6) Vog I would like to talk about the benefits of Pushkin. (7) In our time, when the market with its precise calculations reigns supreme, it seems to many that the spiritual sphere of man is insignificant, it can be neglected, it can be ignored. (8) Indeed, life is governed by an understandable “arithmetic”: you buy where it’s cheaper and better, and the manufacturer, if he doesn’t want to go down the drain, will take care of pleasing the consumer. (9) But such clarity and logic are actually illusory; those who believe in them are much more gullible and naive than those who believe in the moral powers of the human soul.
(10) “Take care of your honor from a young age,” Pushkin bequeathed in his “The Captain's Daughter.” (11) “Why?” - another modern “ideologist” of our market life will ask. (12) Why take care of a product that is in demand: if they pay me well for this very “honor,” then I will sell it. (13) Remember the merchant Paratov from “The Dowry”: “I don’t have anything treasured, I’ll find a profit, so I’ll sell everything, whatever...” (14) And the only obstacle to this transaction is the question of price. (15) But what does such completely reasonable logic lead to in our lives? (16) Here a pharmacy worker is offered counterfeit medicines, and he agrees to sell them not at all because he fiercely wishes harm to people, but simply because it is beneficial for him, and the obstacle of “honor”, “shame” and other “unnecessities” has been eliminated. (17) Here a university teacher gets yesterday's poor student into university for a bribe. People step over their conscience only because they consider it something ephemeral, invented, and the banknotes that they receive in their hands are a completely material basis for well-being. (19) But what does this scanty philosophy lead to, what terrible, completely material, completely tangible troubles does this meager wisdom, this unprincipledness, this “dishonor” bring us?
(20) Many perceive the moral appeals of Russian writers as tedious teaching, not realizing that they are based on the desire to save a person. (21) And the fate of our country, which has all the material prerequisites for becoming one of the richest countries in the world, but which for some reason still remains poor, just speaks of how important the human soul is, how important be honest and conscientious.
(According to S. Kudryashov)
3. Text information
Main problems:
1) the problem of the role of literature in the spiritual life of modern society (what is the significance of Russian literature for modern people");
2) the problem of honor (how are the moral foundations of society and the development of the country as a whole interconnected?)
position: modern society is great because literature
develops moral principles in people;
the merchant's philosophy brings to society
real danger; 2) priority of honor, high moral
demandingness is the most important condition ______ prosperity of our country. _____________________
Criteria assessments answer on task C1
Unified State Exam, 2007 RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, 11th grade.
Option: 57
1. Task formulation
Write an essay based on the text you read.
Formulate and comment on one of the problems posed
Justify your answer based on knowledge, life or
reading experience (the first two arguments are taken into account).
The volume of the essay is at least 150 words.
A work written without relying on the text read (not based on this
text) is not evaluated.
If the essay is a retelling or complete
rewritten original text without any comments,
then such work is scored zero points.
Write an essay carefully, legible handwriting.
2. Source text
(1) During Holy Week, the Laptevs were at the art school at an art exhibition.
(2) Laptev knew the names of all famous artists and did not miss a single exhibition. (3) Sometimes in the summer at the dacha he himself painted landscapes with paints, and it seemed to him that he had wonderful taste and that if he had studied, he would probably have turned out to be a good artist. (4) At home he had all the pictures large sizes, but bad; the good ones are hanged badly. (3) It happened to him more than once to pay dearly for things that later turned out to be crude fakes. (6) And it is remarkable that, timid in general in life, he was extremely bold and self-confident at art exhibitions. (7) Why?
(8) Yulia Sergeevna looked at the paintings, like her husband, through her fist or through binoculars and was surprised that the people in the paintings looked like they were alive, and the trees looked like real ones; but she didn’t understand, it seemed to her that there were many identical paintings at the exhibition and that the whole purpose of art was precisely so that in the paintings, when you look at them with your fist, people and objects stand out as if they were real.
(9) “This is Shishkin’s forest,” her husband explained to her. (10) - He always writes the same thing, but pay attention: such purple snow never happens, but this boy left hand shorter than the right one.
(13) When everyone was tired and Laptev went to look for Kostya to go home, Yulia stopped in front of a small landscape and looked at him indifferently. (14) In the foreground is a river, behind it is a log bridge, on the other side is a path disappearing into the dark grass, a field, then on the right is a piece of forest, near it there is a fire: they must be guarding it at night. (15) And in the distance the evening dawn is burning out.
(1b) Julia imagined how she herself was walking along the bridge, then along the path, further and further, and all around was quiet, sleepy twitchers were screaming, a fire was blinking in the distance. (17) And for some reason it suddenly began to seem to her that she had seen these very clouds that stretched across the red part of the sky, and the forest, and the field many times a long time ago, she felt lonely, and she wanted to go and walk along the path ; and where the evening dawn was, rested the reflection of something unearthly, eternal.
(18) - How well it is written! - she said, surprised that the picture suddenly became clear to her. (19) - Look, Alyosha! (20)Do you notice how quiet it is here?
(21) She tried to explain why she liked this landscape so much, but neither her husband nor Kostya understood her. (22) She kept looking at the landscape with a sad smile, and the fact that others did not find anything special in it worried her. (23) Then she again began to walk through the halls and examine the paintings, she wanted to understand them, and it no longer seemed to her that there were many identical paintings at the exhibition. (24) When she, returning home, for the first time in all the time drew attention to the large picture hanging in the hall above the piano, she felt enmity towards her and said:
(25) - I would love to have such pictures!
(26) And after that, golden cornices, Venetian mirrors with flowers and paintings like the one that hung above the piano, as well as her husband’s and Kostya’s discussions about art aroused in her a feeling of boredom, annoyance and sometimes even hatred.
Evaluation criteria "answer" to task C1
Single state exam, 2007, RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, 11th grade.
Option: 57
3. Text information |
||
Main problems: | the problem of human perception of art (how does a person perceive art? Why do some people immerse themselves in the world created by the artist, while others remain deaf to the world of beauty?); the problem of the value of real art (what art can be considered real? What is the value of real, genuine art?). |
|
art says a lot to a sensitive person, makes you think about the most mysterious and intimate; What is valuable in art is its ability to influence the human soul, therefore, genuine art is that which ennobles the soul and elevates a person’s thoughts. |
Criteria grading the answer to md"nne C1
Unified State Exam, 2007 RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, 11th grade.
Option: 58
^Formulation of the task
Write an essay based on the text you read.
Formulate and comment on one of the problems posed
Justify your answer based on knowledge, life or
reading experience (the first two arguments are taken into account).
The volume of the essay is at least 150 words.
A work written without relying on the text read (not based on this
text) is not evaluated.
If the essay is a retelling or complete
rewritten original text without any comments,
then such work is scored zero points.
Write an essay carefully, legible handwriting.
2. Source text
(1) Most people imagine happiness very concretely: two rooms are happiness, three are more happiness, four are just a dream. (2) Or beautiful appearance: although everyone knows about “don’t be born beautiful...”, however, deep down in our souls we firmly believe that with a different ratio of waist and hip volumes, our life could have turned out differently.
(3) Wishes can come true. (4) There is always hope, if not for slender hips, then at least for an extra room, and if you are very lucky, then for a house overlooking the sea. (5) But what if our houses and figure have nothing to do with the feeling of complete bliss? (6) What if each of us from birth has a greater or lesser ability for happiness - an ear for music or mathematical abilities?
(7) This is exactly the conclusion that psychologist Robert McCray came to after a ten-year study he conducted, covering about 5,000 people. (8) At the beginning and end of the experiment, participants were asked to talk about the events of their lives and characterize themselves. (9) Are they smiling or gloomy? (10) Do they see the glass as half full or half empty?
(P) Amazingly, the degree of satisfaction with one's own life was almost the same at the beginning and end of the study, regardless of what was happening in the lives of its participants. (12) People rejoiced, were upset, and mourned, but as time passed, they returned to their starting point. (13) The level of happiness of each person was associated mainly with his personality, and not with the circumstances of his life.
(14) Then they decided to measure this elusive constant. (15) used a special technology—positron emission tomography—to measure neural activity in the brain under different conditions. (16) It turned out that people who are naturally energetic, enthusiastic and optimistic have high activity in a certain area of the cerebral cortex - the left prefrontal zone, which is associated with positive emotions. (I)The activity of this zone is a surprisingly constant indicator: scientists took measurements at intervals of up to 7 years, and the level of activity remained the same. (18) This means that some people are literally born happy. (19) Their wishes come true more often, and even if this does not happen, they do not dwell on failures, but find the bright side in the situation.
(20) But what about those whose left prefrontal zone is not so active? (21) It’s a shame to live and know that even a crystal palace on a tropical island will not bring you happiness! (22) Why then all the effort? (23) Why make a career and build houses, diet and sew clothes, if the amount of happiness is measured out to you at birth and will not change one iota? (According to K. Korshunova)
3. Text information
Main 1) the problem of understanding happiness (happiness is a concept
problems: abstract or concrete? What is the content
this concept? Is it achievable?): 2) the problem of the ability to be happy (is every person capable of being happy? Or does it need to be learned? Is the ability to be happy innate, like any other? Is it possible to develop the ability to feel happiness? And Is each of us capable of this?). _
position: a person always has hope that his desires
will come true and he will achieve happiness;
2) experiments by scientists prove that there is an innate ability to be happy; If we consider that there is a gene for happiness, it is doubtful that every person can be happy.
Criteria assessments answer to task C1
Single state exam, 2007 RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, 11 Class.
Option: 59
1. Formulation tasks
Write an essay based on the text you read.
Formulate and comment on one of the problems posed
Justify your answer based on knowledge, life or
reading experience (the first two arguments are taken into account).
The volume of the essay is at least 150 words.
A work written without relying on the text read (not based on this
text) is not evaluated.
If the essay is a retelling or complete
rewritten original text without any comments,
then such work is scored zero points.
Write an essay carefully, legible handwriting.
2. Source text
(1) On the bank of the Moksha River sat an old man in a naval uniform. (2) The last pre-autumn dragonflies fluttered over him, some sat on worn epaulettes, took a breath and fluttered when the man occasionally moved. (3) He felt stuffy, he relaxed his long-unbuttoned collar with his hand and froze, peering with teary eyes into the palms of the small waves patting the river. (4) What did he see now in this shallow water? (5) What was he thinking about?
(6) Until recently, he still knew that he had won great victories, that he had managed to break free from the captivity of old theories and discovered new laws of naval combat, that he had created more than one invincible squadron, and trained many glorious commanders and crews of warships.
(7) But barely ten years passed after his resignation, and they tried to forget about him in the imperial palace, in the Admiralty, and in the headquarters of the fleets and naval schools. (8) So, forgotten by the authorities and naval commanders here, in the center of Russia, in the Tambov region, Fyodor Fedorovich Ushakov, a disgraced Russian naval commander, was ending his life. (9) He conducted forty campaigns and was not defeated in a single battle. (10) The brilliant victories of the Russian fleet under his command made the name of Fyodor Ushakov legendary. (11) But few people remembered this in Russia then...
(12) Contemporaries often do not notice the genius, talent, prophet in their environment. (13) They cannot, and if we recall history, they do not want to highlight the outstanding, superior abilities of their neighbor. (14) They speak with irritation about such a person, elevating him, at best, to the category of eccentrics and lucky people...
(15) The sounds of that day mixed in him, floating one on top of the other, making him shudder and look around. (16) He recalled long campaigns and battles. (17) His eyes were open, but his gaze wandered somewhere out there, across distant roadsteads, bays and harbors, and came across fortress walls and coastal reefs.
(18) The wind blew, trying to wrap and swaddle the lonely admiral, and he pushed him away with his hand, trying to delay the visions of the past.
(According to V. Ganichev)
3. Information about the text
Main 1) the problem of historical memory (should it be preserved in
problems: stories, remembering the names and exploits of people,
who glorified themselves in any profession or in defense of the Fatherland, such as, for example, Fyodor Ushakov?);
2) the problem of loneliness (what makes a person feel lonely?);
3) the problem of assessing talent by contemporaries (which prevents contemporaries of a talented person from
appreciate his abilities?).
position: those who glorified their Fatherland with discoveries in some
or professions, including the naval; The memory of the defenders of the Fatherland should be especially carefully preserved in subsequent generations;
2) a person feels lonely when he ceases to benefit people, when his discoveries and achievements in any field remain unappreciated;
3) contemporaries often act cruelly towards a genius, inflict mental wounds on a talented person, because they cannot or do not want to recognize abilities more outstanding than
Evaluation criteria answer ive exercise C1
Unified State Exam, 2007 RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, 11th grade.
Option 60
1. Task formulation
Write an essay based on the text you read.
Formulate and comment on one of the problems posed
Justify your answer based on knowledge, life or
reading experience (the first two arguments are taken into account).
The volume of the essay is at least 150 words.
A work written without relying on the text read (not based on this
text) is not evaluated.
If the essay is a retelling or complete
rewritten original text without any comments,
then such work is scored zero points.
Write an essay carefully, legible handwriting.
2. Source text
(1) The editor of the magazine received an interesting letter. (2) The author, a seventy-two-year-old Muscovite, writes: “When I look at my fourteen-year-old grandson, it sometimes seems to me that he is some kind of alien - he doesn’t look like his mother, me, or his grandmother. (3) No, he’s actually a good guy, it’s a shame to complain: he studies decently, helps his mother - my daughter - with the housework as much as he can, and even in his rude address to me “grandfather” I sometimes feel affection. But his clothes, this sweater with hanging sleeves, jeans with holes in the knees, two earrings in one ear, his speech with all these “outfits” and “gags”, his views and the fact that all my thoughts and judgments cause him ridicule - all this makes him a real alien in our family...
(5) Looking at my grandson and his friends, passing by noisy groups of teenagers, I cannot help but wonder: where did they come from, these strange, self-confident and ignorant youths? (6) Who made them like this?
(7) There is no need to argue with the author of the letter. (8) What he writes about is probably familiar to most readers who have grandchildren. (9) The only thing we cannot unconditionally agree with is the question “Who made them like this?” (10) We are so accustomed to looking for those to blame for everything that a calm look at things, an attempt to find an objective explanation, is, unfortunately, difficult for us. (11) Of course, it is much easier to say that television, American films, schools, the market economy, and the government are to blame for everything, than to try to understand the reason for the so frighteningly widening gap between fathers and children, not to mention grandchildren.
(12) And this abyss, by the way, has always been there. (13) One hundred and forty years ago he wrote his famous novel “Fathers and Sons” about this. (14) Why Turgenev! (15) In one of the ancient Egyptian papyri, the author complains that children have ceased to respect their fathers, their religion and customs, and that the world is truly collapsing.
(1b) Another thing is that in previous times changes in human society occurred immeasurably slower than now. (17) While studying the impact of the accelerated pace of history in the second half of the 20th century, psychologists even coined the term “future shock.” (18) This is a feeling of confusion, helplessness, disorientation that covers people when their psyche ceases to keep up with too rapid changes in society, in technology, in morals and customs. (19) What can we say about us, when in one decade - an elusive moment by the standards of history - we experienced a number of shocks: the economic formation, the political system changed, the familiar country disappeared. (20) This is not just a future shock, it is a super shock. (21) One can only be amazed at the mental fortitude that allowed people to withstand such historical tsunamis.
(22) So is it worth looking for those to blame for the fact that children and grandchildren are not like us? (23) They just live in a different time, in a different era. (24) Who is better, us or them, is a question to which there will never be a clear answer. (25) If for some of us they are aliens, then for them we are, at best, strange old people who do not understand anything about modern life and are afraid of everything.
(26) What should we do to somehow narrow the ditch separating us? (27) First of all, we need to be patient and learn to respect each other’s views and morals, no matter how alien they may seem to us. (28) And this, of course, is difficult, but necessary.
(According to E. Korenevskaya)
Criteria for assessing the answer to task C1
Single state exam, 2007 RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, 11th grade.
Option: 60
3. Text information
Main 1) the problem of fathers and sons (how the era affects
problems: relationships between fathers and children?);
position: parents, grandparents because they live in
another era, another time, when rapid changes are taking place in society; young people bravely withstand “historic tsunamis”; 2) the views and morals of young people deserve respect. Therefore, adults must learn to understand their children; and then the gap between generations will disappear.
Real art. What should it be and what is its significance? It is this problem that publicist Igor Gontsov addresses in his text.
Reflecting on the question posed, the author notes that at present many pop “stars” often build their image on shocking behavior, behave defiantly, neglecting moral norms. The reason for this is the desire to attract attention and gain even greater popularity. Gontsov says with concern that all this has a destructive effect on teenagers, who often take their cues from the “stars” and imitate them.
As a literary argument, I would like to cite Nikolai Gogol’s story “Portrait,” where this problem is raised.
The paintings of the main character of the story, Chartkov, a young artist, which he made while absorbed in a secular lifestyle, were devoid of their manner, their own look and did not reflect the author’s vision. Chartkov painted them for money, without putting his soul into it; These pictures did not evoke any deep feelings. And then we see the work of a young artist, an Italian, which amazed Chartkov and made it clear that he had lost his talent.
I hope that readers will think about this problem, about the purpose and power of true art, which should awaken only the most beautiful spiritual qualities in people.
Updated: 2018-03-19
Attention!
Thank you for your attention. Useful material on the topic
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
By doing so, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.